The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
19 January 2013
Filed under Book Reviews
Tags: Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Just finished reading THGtoG by Douglas Adams. This isn’t the first time I’ve read this book and probably won’t be the last. I picked up an old paperback a couple of weeks ago at a used book store and as the cover says published in 1979 I’m including this as one of my books on the Vintage Sci Fi event hosted by Little Red Reviewer. I’m also including on Stainless Steel Droppings Sci-Fi experience.
I love this book and can quite genuinely say I don’t think that I’ll ever become bored with it. It’s such a funny take on all things sci fi! If you haven’t read it you definitely need to do so, even if you’ve watched the series or seen the film you should still read this book. That’s right, I’m looking at you and don’t make me come over there!
The story starts with Arthur Dent waking to find his home almost in the process of being demolished in order to make way for a bypass- which turns out to be small fry as we swiftly move on to find out that the whole planet is about to be laid waste by a Vogon Constructor Fleet also in order to make way for a bypass. Arthur is of course rescued in the final minute by his friend Ford Prefect – who isn’t in fact from the planet earth but was left stranded there 15 years earlier – he’s actually from the planet Beetlegeuse and writes snippets for the Hitch Hikers Guide.
We then follow Arthur and Ford as they fall from one near fatal experience to the next.
The characters involved, as well as the above mentioned, – Trillian, Zaphod Beeblebrox and Marvin the Paranoid Android. I love these characters. Particularly Marvin – how can you have a paranoid android! I took this snippet from the last couple of chapters where Ford finds Marvin lying face down on the floor (well more trips over him than finds!)
‘Marvin! he exclaimed. ‘What are you doing?” ‘Dont feel you have to take any notice of me, please,’ came a muffled drone. ‘But how are you, metalman?’ said Ford. “very depressed.” “What’s up?” “I don’t know,” said Marvin, “I’ve never been there.” “Why,” said Ford squatting down beside him and shivering, “are you lying face down in the dust?” “It’s a very effective way of being wretched,” said Marvin.
Okay, that’s probably not the best bit to choose but I found it funny.
I mean, it’s not just a funny book though, it’s also thought provoking and takes a look at all sorts of issues, a bit of politics, a bit of religion, a bit of friendship.
Basically, don’t take my word for it – go and read it. It’ll only take a few hours out of your life and I think it’ll give you a kick. Everybody needs a bit of humour in their life and if you like, for example, Monty Python or Blackadder then this book can’t possibly fail!
Hey, you can have my beaten up copy that originally sold for 80p if it’ll make you read it!!
Dragonflight readalong conclusion, Anne McCaffrey
17 January 2013
Filed under Book Reviews
Tags: Anne McCaffrey, Dragonflight, Readalong, Stainless Steel Droppings
Today is the conclusion of the Dragonflight readalong being hosted by Carl over at Stainless Steel Droppings. This has been an interesting book split really into almost two halves. The first introduces us to Pern and it’s inhabitants and dragons. The second half brings us something a little more unusual in terms of stepping outside of the realms of fantasy and into the realms of sci fi. If you haven’t read this book already the following post will include spoilers.
1. The Threads are further explored and become very much the focal point in parts 3 and 4 of Dragonflight. What are your thoughts on the Threads in general and how do you feel these worked as an enemy vs. the traditional enemies you see in SFF novels?
They almost don’t feel like an enemy. They’re not, after all, coming onto the planet and attacking people (as in swords and bombs, etc) – they’re just like some sort of alien plant life and maybe these threads are always shedded from the planet and if they land somewhere and grow root then all well and good – just like natural plant life, seeds from trees, spores from ferns and fungus. In a way it all seems much more natural and not like some nasty predator with big gnashing teeth – but for all that, the threat of them is very real, just again like in nature, when trees, for example, are sometimes killed by fungus attac, Basically the threads will turn the planet into a desert in fairly short order so it’s pretty damn important that they’re eliminated. I’m not sure that the Red Planet has an evil or malicious plan? It doesn’t feel like that to me at the moment. It just feels more like nature taking it’s course even if it is destructive. I suppose the other thing is that this is from a different planet and maybe there’s a natural predator there that keeps the threads in check? That being said it’s still a very potent threat. So, to cut a long story short, I like what McCaffrey has come up with here. Like I said, ‘threads’ they sound pretty innocuous but really they’re quite deadly. They might not be little green men with bulbous heads shouting ‘ack, ack, ack, we come in piece’ right before they dissolve you but they’re still pretty nasty!
2. The science fictional concept of time travel becomes an important device in the later half of Dragonflight, how do you feel McCaffrey did in working time travel into the plot?
I really enjoyed this aspect. It makes my head spin if I’m going to be totally honest because I get into this whole what came first question. Like The Terminator – if the Terminator hadn’t gone back in time to kill John Connor then the technology would not have existed to build the robots that eventually cause the nuclear disaster – so, time travel makes me all a dither and I have to pay proper attention, literally stop reading while I think about all the implications of the last chapter. I did actually guess about the importance of the time travel – probably stupidly, I thought maybe it would involve the future. Now, before you all jump out of your seats – I was thinking maybe Lessa coming back from the future to help them (because in the future she would know there was a problem now?? But would she have survived the problem in order to have come back? I give up). Having read on, of course, I realise how unrealistic this is because McCaffrey was keeping the whole time travel continuum thing in place with the not meeting your own self. But, yes, I really enjoyed this aspect of the story.
3. Of the new characters introduced in this second half of Dragonflight, who did you like/not like and why?
I liked the master harper guy whose name now escapes me (was it Robinton?)- need to go back and check his name out. Not sure if I particularly disliked anyone. I mean, you’re probably not supposed to like some of the Lord of Manor types – they’re all a bit obnoxious and yet after all there ‘oh, there are no threads and we’re not paying you tithes’ they were pretty quick to the table to bemoan what needed to be done when the real threat became apparent. I suppose the real person who was so horrible and hate-worthy was killed in the first few chapters.
4. We talked about it in the first discussion and there is no way we can get away from it in Part 2: What are your feelings on the progression of the relationship between F’lar and Lessa throughout this second half of the book?
Well, I was really puzzled when there was discussion about this last week because I hadn’t read further. Reading on this week my initial reaction was ‘what? you have to be kidding me’. In fact when I realised the full extent of what had happened I was pretty annoyed and almost at first a bit astonished that McCaffrey was writing that as part of her storyline. But then I got back to a bit more sideways thinking. Thinking about the threat which is a very natural threat, the way the weyr live feels a lot more closer to nature. It might not be our way but it is reflected quite a bit in the natural world and is clearly the way they live and what they expected. The top dog rules, the end. Having said that Lessa and F’Lar have clearly now developed feelings towards each other – so what happens if his dragon is no longer victorious!! Or maybe there’s more choice in it than we really know. Maybe the dragons have a lot more influence over who their partner is – I don’t know what I’m talking about basically which must be very apparent! But, yes, obviously I didn’t like what happened to Lessa but I can respect that this is a different planet, a different way of living, different rules, different expectations – just take the rounding up of the young boys who become dragonriders – you wouldn’t be best please would you if some dragon riding guy flys out of the sky and takes your son off. And the women chosen – some of them died when the dragon queen hatched! Different world, you could call them less civilised but basically at the end of the day it’s apples and pears.
5. And finally, what is your overall assessment of Dragonflight? How does it measure up against other classic science fiction you’ve read? Would you recommend it to modern readers, why or why not?
I really enjoyed it and would definitely recommend to other readers. It’s not fantasy and its not sci fi – fusion!! What works about this is it’s not been done in a sort of surreal way. We don’t have this mediaeval world with dragons that is then invaded by the little green men shouting ‘ack, ack, ack’. It feels more, not realistic, but acceptable. Okay, and, I’m not comparing this to Feist’s Riftwar Sage in terms of story but I suppose the Magician was similar in that it quite seemlessly blended the two elements and made them work together in a way that felt reasonable. I can’t really compare this to a lot of classic sci fi because I’m not well enough read but I enjoyed it. I must admit though that the sci-fi element feels quite minimal – and what I suppose I mean by that is it’s not all gadgets and spaceships, hyperspace and strange new creatures.
This has been a great readalong Carl – thanks for hosting. A great choice of book with plenty of debate and discussion which was really enjoyable to take part in.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K Dick
15 January 2013
Filed under Book Reviews
Tags: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K Dick
Just finished reading Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and will start out by saying that I found this a really great book. I’m including this both as my Vintage Sci fi none challenge being hosted over at Little Red Reviewer and also the Science Fiction Experience being hosted by Stainless Steel Droppings.
We follow the story of Rick Deckard in a world trying to survive after World War Terminus. Deckard is a bounty hunter, he works for and earns a regular salary with the Police and earns extra money by stalking rogue androids. Androids are not used on earth, they’re used on the other planets that have been colonised by survivors of WWT – it’s an incentive for people to leave earth. Every now and again however the androids become tired of their servitude and break free.
This is a strange book really when you think about it. There’s not a really massive plot to be frank, its based around one day in the life of Deckard but it is a brilliant portrayal of that one day, it’s quite filled with imagination, and I suppose its a good look at people and their nature.
Now, I hope I haven’t made it seem lame because it’s far from that. Basically the start of Deckards day commences with an introduction to his wife. She’s a bit depressed – I’m not sure if she’s actually really depressed or if she’s been abusing her mood machine – what about that. Something to wake you up in the morning – but in a good mood – and then a machine where you dial a mood for the rest of the day! Ha, I know what I’d be doing right there – break into the big cheese’s house and dial him up a healthy dose of happy days together with a ‘take the day off everyone, relax, and have a pay rise’ mood. Or would that be a bit too much like abuse?
So, in this day and age we have this thing about the people next door and everyone being in a competition right? You get a conservatory and I’ll get a swimming pool, you get a new car, I get a helipad. Well, it’s reassuring to know that even after WWT and the virtual destruction of the planet, with many life forms becoming extinct due to a thick layer of dust, people remain consistent. That’s right there’s still the ‘my house is bigger than your house’ syndrome going on. Animals, birds, insects – are all rare and much adored. The one ideal is to own a pet and to take care of it. It really is the ultimate status symbol. It shows our empathy and it’s what distinguishes us from the androids. But Deckard, on his salary, can’t afford an animal and so has an electric sheep – a fact that he keeps hidden from the neighbour and something that partly contributes to his wife’s feelings of depression. Then, as a result of the chief bounty hunter being taken out of action, by a rogue android, Deckard inherits his list – 6 potential androids and the rewards that go with them. Finally, Deckard may be able to buy a real animal.
What then follows is Deckard’s day tracking the androids and retiring them. No prizes for guessing what ‘retiring’ means. During the course of the day however Deckard starts to experience, for the first time, personal doubts about what he does and if it’s really right. I mean, these androids are so real like. They look amazing and the only way to tell them apart is a brain marrow test or an empathy test which involves a series of questions and a gauge to measure the androids reactions.
I’m not going to go too much further into the plot. It certainly has a few twists and turns and it’s a fairly hectic, stressful and difficult to say the least day for Deckard.
What I thought was great was the way the author plays with your emotions. At a point, he makes you really feel for the androids. You totally sympathise with them and think it’s harsh the treatment that they receive. But then he turns it around and you’re thinking what a bunch of bastards they are. Especially – that Rosen woman and the whole goat episode. I’m not going to say more. Except, what a bitch! She needed retiring for sure.
Anyway, to cut a could be longer than this story short. I enjoyed this very much. But, wait, I forgot something – okay, I wasn’t really happy with Deckard and that whole liaison business (trying to be secretive over here), except I thought this was included because of the subsequent revelation which served to reinforce his own self belief. And, what on earth was going on with the frog? Can’t say any more.
Really good though. Definitely recommend this. The writing style is very easy to get on with, plenty of imagination, I actually liked Deckard (mainly) and it was a good display of an author playing with the reader’s emotions.
Mooching, books and random thoughts
Thankfully I didn’t include any resolutions in my New Year ‘rules I like to break list’ about not adding to my stacks. Phew, that’s a good thing. Yesterday, spent a couple of hours mooching round the shops and in particular a second hand bookstore, very conveniently situated about 10 minutes walk from where I live. And, came away with the following goodies which I’m really pleased with:
The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman – I’ve already read this but it was the library copy and I obviously wanted my own – I will be reading this again. So I’ve picked up a beautiful copy, hardback illustrated by Dave McKean. What a find! Believe me, Neil Gaiman’s books are very rarely seen in second hand book shops! I sort of did a double take and then quickly snatched if off the shelf before anyone else had the chance!
Haunted by James Herbert – decided I needed to pick up JH after a very long departure from his books. Thought I could save this for this year’s RIP at Stainless Steel Droppings (already downloaded to Kindle Lovecraft’s complete works with this in mind although don’t think I can read all of them!) I’ve just realised that I am just assuming that Carl will be hosting a RIP event this year! Well, I certainly hope so – it’s a massive event (which is why I’m already collecting books!)
The Mote in God’s Eye by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle – what a very unusual cover this book has, I haven’t the foggiest notion what is going on – who knows maybe the content will reveal all. Hoping to get to this as part of the Vintage Sci fi but realistically might not manage it – it does look rather chunky to say the least! Maybe I’ll just squeeze it into the Sci Fi Experience instead. Funnily the cover price says UK £1.25 – exactly how old is this copy?? The back of the book says ‘a masterpiece to rank with Dune and Stranger in a Strange Land’. Well, time will tell. Anybody out there agree with that??
The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Definitely reading this this month (I almost read a quarter of it in the shop! Standing in the aisle, clutching all my books and smiling at the start of the story). Again, not read this in ages.
And, finally:
Beyond Black by Hilary Mantel – this one does seem a little out of character with the books above but apparently this is a ghost story, so, again, RIP.
So, now all I have to do is find some hiding places for these so the hubby doesn’t know I’m sneaking in contraband! (although, I only paid £7.50 for all the lot – it would have been rude not to buy them under the circumstances!)
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A Heinlein
11 January 2013
Filed under Book Reviews
Tags: Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Vintage Sci Fi
Hey, smile if you bundled last night!!
Okay, that out of the system, just finished reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A Heinlein. I’ve read this as part of the Vintage Sci fi event I’m taking part in and happily this also counts to my other none challenge event being hosted over at Stainless Steel Droppings.
Oh my giddy aunt. What a thought provoking book. It creates a little tornado of emotions and, yes, (slight spoiler) it has a somewhat sad end (did I say somewhat! slight understatement) but it also has plenty of humour – a good deal of which I probably missed or that went over my head but, I’m getting away with myself.
The Moon really is a Harsh Mistress! Without a doubt. The story brings to us a Moon that has been colonised – mainly with criminals or political exiles but what is interesting is that the population is obviously now increased due to the number of people actually being born to families within these colonies (the reason I found this interesting is that there is no return to earth for any of these people – it seems a little like the children are also suffering from the sins of the parents in a way although it’s not like they could return on their own). The families live in underground tunnels and work hard to survive sending a good deal of their produce back to earth, probably as part of their punishment. They pay for air and they live without luxury. And yet, they seem content. They have their own strict rules that they abide by and woe-betide anybody who breaks the code – think of honour among thieves – put basically you keep your good family name, you settle your debts and you don’t step out of line otherwise you might as well walk out onto the surface without your airtight suit. Think not of being sent to Coventry but of being sent to a small planet in the outer ring of Saturn. Dead.
So, life goes on. However, the inhabitants have no idea that at the current rate that they are using the planets resources they are likely to run out fairly quickly and that will have disastrous results. (Actually, now I’ve actually stated that in print was Heinlein trying to make a point about our use of the Earth’s natural resources?)
At the start of the story we’re introduced to Manuel, who used to be a farmer but due to the loss of a limb is now an engineer who is frequently called upon to service the planet’s mainframe computer – Mike. Mike is developing a personality and Manuel or Man is becoming his only friend. Then step up and meet Wyoming and Professor de la Paz. Manuel meets Wyoming at a sort of political rally that goes a little bit pear shaped and means that the two of them have to keep a low profile for a while. Wyoming is something of a political activist, fairly well known in her home town and the authorities have their eye on her. The professor is a ‘rational anarchist’ – what a lovely phrase and contradiction in terms. Anyway, to cut a long story short and not to go too much into detail Manuel introduces his two friends to Mike. They pretty soon become aware of the impending threat to their way of life and start to cook up a rebellion. That’s all I’m going to say for the plot.
Put basically this is a book about revolution and an overthrowing of unacceptable control.
Like I said earlier, there is such a lot to think about in this book. I wish I’d actually kept some notes as I was reading because I’m sure that I’ve forgotten more than I ever knew and everything is now a big jumble! But, for example, the Professor’s idea of not living with rules – he basically states he’s a free man, he abides with the rules he can tolerate and not by those he can’t. Yet, we all do live with rules don’t we? Even in the colonies on the moon the inhabitants live by their own self-imposed rules. They don’t have a Government or Royalty or a President – and yet again, interestingly, when they begin their revolution they almost start to emulate the very systems on the planet they’re rejecting (puts you in mind of animal farm – no more farmer, all the animals in a co-operative until the pigs get bigger ideas that is). Really there is such a lot of interesting reading going on here.
I admit that at first I wondered what was going on with the form of writing. It’s told in a strange type of translated Russian – not sure whether that is a reflection on the author’s thoughts in terms of the Russian Revolution? or not?? But, it took me a little while to get used to it until I suddenly seemed to have turned a corner and was almost reading with an accent going on in my head! I also confess – when Mike kept saying things to Manuel such as ‘you’re my only friend man’ – I just thought he was imitating some strange type of hippie talk until it dawned on me that Man was short for Manuel (ahem, well I never said I was going to split the atom!) Anyway, once I got used to Manuel’s form of narration I found myself enjoying the book a lot more and actually understanding a lot of the fun that is incorporated.
I thought there was a lot of humour in the book, although there is a very strong possibility that I’m reading it wrong. And, I’m sure that I missed things that will be funny for some whilst laughing at other things that they may have missed. But that’s part of the reading experience after all. For example, I loved the little speech during the revolution that the Professor made to the crowds on luna – which was virtually the famous ‘we will fight them on the beaches’ speech made by Churchill adapted for the current situation. I loved the fact that the inhabitants of Luna are called loonies. And, I thought it was great that due to the ratio of men to women on the planet the women on Luna really do rule the roost! So original. Let’s face it chaps – one wrong move and you’ll find yourself ejected into outer space!
Now, obviously there’s a revolution and as we know from history we can’t have a revolution without some casualties. I won’t say any more except TANSTAAFL! Ain’t it the truth!
Very enjoyable read. Now reading Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep – only two chapters in but I think it’s got me already!




