Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury

‘The seller of lightning rods arrived just ahead of the storm.’  I love this opening line.  It draws you in immediately and piques your interest.

Something Wicked This Way Comes

Something Wicked This Way Comes

Just finished reading Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury which I really enjoyed.  I wanted to read this book for a number of reasons, it’s on my classics list, it’s on my RIP list, I’ve also read plenty of good things about it  but, in fairness, and bizarrely the real thing that kept bringing this to my mind, was one of the Harry Potter films, and I can’t remember which one, but it starts with the Hogwart’s choir singing ‘Something Wicked This Way Comes.  What a strange and whimsical fashion to choose your books and yet it feels oddly appropriate with this particular novel.

I really enjoyed this.  It’s the story of two young boys, living in a fairly typical town.  The type of boys who are usually up to a bit of mischief, albeit harmless, creeping out of their bedroom windows of an evening when their parents think they’re tucked up safely in bed to go and play in places they shouldn’t really be and to conjure magical adventures.  Then, on one such evening, the carnival comes to town and the boys become involved in something much more sinister than they ever imagined.  A fight for life in fact.

Firstly, a note on the author’s style of writing.  Fantastical is probably the best description that I can come up with.  The prose are almost poetic at points and strangely evocative.  The author definitely has his own style but as soon as I’d become accustomed to this I was totally drawn into the story.

Will and Jim are the two main characters.  Both rough and tumble, best friends.  Jim borders a little more onto the dangerous and darker side and it’s this side of his nature that draws him to the carnival and brings him to the attention of the strange performers.  This carnival isn’t of the everyday.  The illustrated man is not all he seems and many of the performers are held in a strange and subdued captivity.  There are so many interesting characters and concepts here.  The witch, and particularly her strange form of magic, the whole scene with the hot air balloon was really quite freaky.  The carousel – well, all I can say is I don’t think I can ever enjoy a ride on one of those again!  The maze of mirrors – I must admit I find the Hall of Mirrors in any fairground a bit unnerving but this particular maze magnifies that feeling.   This maze reflects the person’s darkest fears a thousandfold.

I’m not going to go into too much more detail.  The story was undoubtedly creepy.  The plight of the boys reaches a great dramatic climax.  It’s a great look at good and evil and the different shades in between and the strange nature of people that draws them sometimes to things that are dark and supernatural.  On top of this it’s one of those stories that you read and can immediately feel that it’s had an impact on other writers.  And finally, it’s a wonderfully dark and perfect tale to read on an autumn night leading up to Halloween.

I’ve read this for Stainless Steel Droppings RIP event.  This also counts to my Classics Club list.

The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson

The Haunting of Hill House is the first book I’ve completed for my RIP event over at Stainless Steel Droppings (and for those of you who haven’t yet signed up there’s plenty of time to do so.  Details here) and I thought it was great.

Now, firstly I should probably point out that this book was written in the late 50s and so if you’re expecting some sort of horror along the lines of the most recent movie then you’ll probably be disappointed.  (Although I would say that the earlier black and white version does a much better job of portraying the book – even if it doesn’t appeal to horror fans.  (Basically, think along the lines of reading I am Legend and then comparing it to the recent movie – not really anything alike).

For me, this was much more psychological and, if you’ve already read other Jackson stories this will probably ring true for you.

Hill House starts off as an experiment by Dr Montague.  He invites people who he thinks have psychic abilities to come and stay at Hill House, which he believes to be haunted, to see and record their various experiences.  Two of these people respond.  Eleanor and Theodora.  Luke, the heir apparent also joins the cosy little party.

There’s such a lot that I enjoyed about this story.  Jackson is excellent at setting up characters.  Eleanor is, of course, the main character.  She’s lead a strange and inhibited life.  At the constant beck and call of her mother and since her mother’s death seemingly living in the shadow of her sister. At the opposite end we have Theodora with her extrovert nature, beautiful and flippant and frankly the complete opposite of the shrinking violet Eleanor.  Step into their lives two different males characters.  Dr Montague, who acts like the fatherly, wise teacher to the group – although he seems a little out of his own comfort zone – and Luke, who seems to be the object or toy of Theodora’s attention.

So, all of these characters diverge upon Hill House – the only other characters are the gatekeeper/groundsman and his wife – both leave the property locked when they go at 6.00 pm (or when it goes dark – and, by the way, they can’t hear the inhabitants screams from where they live!).  There seems to be a sort of hysteria about Hill House with the villagers – who simply don’t acknowledge it’s presence, let alone speak of it.  Even Eleanor, upon arrival, has an overwhelming fear of the house.  It’s shape, it’s proportions, the way it seems to watch her.

As you read the story you wonder how much of this is a ghost story and how much is a prank on the part of someone else and yet certain of the occurrences can’t so simply be explained away.  All of the guests experience something strange and yet Eleanor seems to be the target.

Is it simply that Eleanor is a little unhinged herself?  I’m not sure even now and am going round in circles thinking about it.  She certainly seemed to lack anything of her own and seemed to come into her own at Hill House.  I definitely had a few moments of thinking maybe she was the perpetrator of certain ‘elements’ of the story in order to gain attention yet as the book progresses I began to think that her behaviour was as a result of the house and certainly some of her thoughts were quite strange to read.

Everything about the house is evil, apparently.  It was built at strange angles so that everything you see is not quite where it should be.  All the doors mysteriously shut by themselves as they seem to be hung on a slant.  The contents are dark and they add to the general feel of foreboding.  The rooms fan out from a central location with no apparent reason, lots of doors from each room lending an overall impression of confusion.

The long story short on this one is simply was Eleanor paranoid delusional or was she influenced by the house.  Given the last thoughts in the book I think the latter but let me know what you think.

This is definitely a good read.  It’s not horrendous or terrible but it definitely has it’s chilling moments and seeing how Eleanor develops and changes and being privy to her sometimes rather strange thoughts was quite fascinating.

I read this as part of my RIP and also my Classics list.

Rereads?? It is folly, not with 10,000 books waiting to be read should you reread…

Or should you??  Today I’m looking at the September meme from the Classics Club which is as follows:

Rereading a favourite classic at different stages of your life gives you different insights with each reading. Is there one classic you’ve read several times that also tells a story about you?

I like this question.  It made me really think.  I’m not totally sure whether I came up with anything revealing but here goes…

I’ve read a few books more than once or even more than twice.  I’ve certainly read Rebecca a number of times and also a few of Austen’s and Dicken’s works but I’m not going to use one of those as examples because I think I only had a few years in between each reading.  I did read Lord of the Rings when I was about 15 and apart from the fact that I loved the story and the writing I also had a total girly crush on Aragorn –  although according to the book he’s not exactly easy on the eye.  I don’t care, he’s a ranger and he’s hot (in my mind).  I then reread this very recently as a group readalong and I think if anything I actually liked it more.  I don’t know whether that’s anything to do with the age difference, the fact that I just love the story or because I’ve watched the films (quite a few times).  Yes, I still liked Aragorn – and you can all go swooning over Legolas in the movie but Viggo Mortensen is my favourite, but I think I enjoyed the writing a lot more this time and the dialogue – which the film has kept surprising close to!

I think when I originally read this I was hooked on the adventure, and, as I mentioned I did have a bit of a crush going on.  More recently I think I was able to enjoy the quality of the writing and feel a little in awe of what Tolkien achieved.  I admit, he’s not everyone’s cup of tea.  I read one blogger, who was not a fan, saying ‘if you like to read a description of every leaf on the tree then give it a go’.  Now, I wouldn’t necessarily agree with that but, and even as a fan, I can see where that person is coming from and I appreciate description isn’t for everyone.  But, reading this again a few years later certainly didn’t detract from the experience for me.  I also think I took my time a little bit more, admittedly that could simply be due to the fact that I wasn’t racing to the end to see how things wound up or it could be because I’m more patient now!  Even if I’m not more patient I think the real difference is that I’m more prepared to read into things now than when I was younger when I was much more about the swashbuckling, swords and sorcery.

Did this have any lessons for me?  I think I could appreciate Gandalf’s words of wisdom more this time around – particularly in relation to the fact that Bilbo had shown Gollum pity rather than killing him when he had the chance – he after all plays a big part in the journey.  So perhaps the lesson is ‘fools rush in…etc, etc’!

Which leads on perfectly to one of my favourite lines:

“Fool of a Took, throw yourself in next time and rid us of your stupidity!”

Update on ‘a gentle nudge’..

The Classics Club Lucky Spin number 3 has been announced and the lucky number is (drum roll)…… 4!

So, looks like I’m reading One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest by Ken Kesey next.  I’m actually looking forward to this although in typical fashion it’s one of the few books on the list that is not sat in my stacks!!  Why choose it then you might well ask??  I asked myself the very same thing.  Anyway ‘takes oneself off to the bookshop’ (it’s a dirty job but somebody has to do it!)

Happy reading everyone.

 

Forewords and other bits and pieces. Love them or hate them????

This week’s meme from the Classics Club:

‘Do you read forewords/notes that precede many classics?  Does it help you or hurt you in your enjoyment/understanding of the work?’

Basically, yes, I have done so, however as the norm I don’t tend to read them.  I’m usually a bit too excited to read the book to read all the forewords, etc.  I do tend to read more if it comes after the book.  Which probably sounds a little odd.  But, if an author writes a piece at the conclusion of the story about motivation, research, ideas,  etc, I usually read that and enjoy it.  Also, I think it depends on how I feel about the book.  Sometimes a book can lead me into all sorts of research because it’s piqued my interest.  It also depends on the length of the piece – I’m sure that one of the books I read recently had about 50 pages as a foreword!  For goodness sake – 50 pages – it’s almost a short book in itself!  I think the foreword can be useful to be honest but my impatience usually gets the better of me although I confess I’m more likely to read it on a reread when I’m more chilled out.

This question gets me to thinking of similar issues.  For example.  Do you love maps in books.  Sometimes I pay attention to them.  But less so if I’m reading on Kindle (it just isn’t convenient).  What about glossaries – I never tend to use them, in fact, to be honest I usually don’t find them until after I’ve finished reading by which time it’s too late!  (I don’t think I’m coming off too well in this piece! so far)

What about illustrations???  I  actually like illustrations in a book.  I have some old Dicken’s books and they have really lovely pictures.   Plus, books like The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman, The Girl who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making  by Catherynne Valente and Poison by Sarah Pinborough – which are beautiful books in their own right.  Lovely cover, well illustrated and great to read.  I think that the reason I like them is that they’re there on the page as I’m reading – probably, if the map was inserted as needs be I would study it more and similarly with glossaries (maybe added as a footnote instead).  It’s just all this constant flipping backwards and forwards in the book is distracting and also a little bit annoying.

What about you – do you read all the glossaries/appendices and other bits and pieces.  I wonder if I should be more thorough but frankly I’m usually all to caught up with moving onto the next book!

I’ve decided I’m a very bad book person!  *must read all additional reading material*

« Previous PageNext Page »