Will you won’t you finish that book…

b2bf5-toptentuesday2This week over at The Broke and Bookish the Top Ten Tuesday topic is:

Ten Books I Almost Put Down But Didn’t:

I actually found this harder than I’d imagined.  I’ve gone for books that I struggled with at some point but ending up either liking or loving.

  1. We Need to Talk About Kevin – this is a very dark read indeed, it took me about 80/90 pages to get into the book but once it took hold it was a compelling read.  A book that you read with a mounting sense of dread that you can’t tear your eyes away from!
  2. Prince of Thorns by Mark Lawrence – when I first started reading I found the age of Jorg a little off putting.  Thankfully this was a very short lived feeling and I became hooked fairly quickly which is a good thing as it’s become one of my favourite fantasy series.  Grimdark at its grimmest and darkest.
  3. The Dresden Files by Jim Butcher – I actually didn’t really enjoy the first book in the series – it was okay but not absolutely amazing, however, I pressed on because other bloggers told me to persist and I’m so glad I did.  The second was great and the series has just gained in momentum and each new edition seems even better than the last.  Thank you to all you lovely bloggers for encouraging me to continue!
  4. I am Legend by Richard Matheson – again, a very bleak read, however, one that is worth the perseverance as the ending is brilliant.
  5. Feed by Mira Grant – this book wasn’t what I was expecting really and that left me a little bit disappointed, plus there was quite a bit of repetition which slowed the read down somewhat – however the ending redeems it.
  6. The Ghost Bride by Yangsze Choo – this is another simple example of the book not being what I thought it would be – however, I don’t regret reading this as the writing is beautiful and evocative.
  7. The Mercedes Thompson series by Patricia Briggs – I really wasn’t taken with the first book at all – however, I completed it because I’d bought the first three in one buy and I then carried on with the second which greatly improved.  I now really enjoy this series so I’m glad I stuck with it.
  8. The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch – the author uses a style that jumps backwards and forwards which at first I found a little confusing and threw me out of the story a little – again, this has turned into one of my favourite series so I’m really pleased I got over the initial feelings and definitely recommend this.
  9. Sunshine by Robin McKinley – I really like this book however the author did use a bit of repetition and also a way of reflecting on past events that came across as info dumping – however that was a short lived feeling and I did really enjoy the story.  I would definitely read more.
  10. Witch Light by Susan Fletcher – when I first picked this book up I felt the narration was a little difficult to get along with.  It probably took me about 40 or so pages to become hooked but when I did I absolutely fell in love with the author’s writing style and have read most of her other books as a result.

 

Classics Club challenge: Book spin No.6

Posted On 11 May 2014

Filed under Book Reviews
Tags: ,

Comments Dropped 4 responses

Okay, it’s time for another book spin over at the Classics Club  (details here) – so far, I’ve done infamously with these only completing one!  Time to buck up!!  I’ve chosen 20 from my list and they’re all fairly easy or ones that I really want to read – I realise that’s semi-cheating but I’m determined to do this thing!!!!!

So, to my twenty:

  1. Three Men in a Boat by Jerome K Jerome
  2. The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark
  3. The BFG by Roald Dahl
  4. White Fang by Jack London
  5. Waverley by Sir Walter Scott
  6. The Importance of Being Ernest by Oscar Wilde
  7. American Gods by Neil Gaiman
  8. Stir of Echoes by Richard Matheson
  9. The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro
  10. Whiskey Galore by Compton MacKenzie
  11. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie
  12. Legend by David Gemmell
  13. Beyond Black by Hilary Mantel
  14. Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk
  15. Trainspotting by Irvine Welsh
  16. Dangerous Liaisons by Choderlos de Laclos
  17. Perfume by Patrick Suskindn
  18. Let the Right one in by John Ajvide Lindqvist
  19. Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare
  20. The Turn of the Screw by Henry James

Results on Monday!  Rather hoping to get Twelfth Night so fingers crossed!

Awards, facts and random Q&A

Keri over at IV League has nominated me for a Liebster Award.  I’m going to keep this short and sweet and I’m also going to cheat a little bit (so it could be I end up being disqualified!)  Further info here.

11 Facts:

  1. I’m married with three children
  2. I’m the youngest of three with a brother and a sister
  3. I have a dog called Dude – after The Dude in the Big Lebowski
  4. I don’t drive – gasp!
  5. I like to cook but not to bake – to much weighing and measuring and not enough improvisation
  6. I could be in the Olympics if they had a medal for sleeping, I have to have at least 8 hours and think nothing of sleeping 10!!  I’m worse than a surly teenager
  7. I’m a book freak
  8. My preferred books are fantasy, sci fi, and historical
  9. I prefer wine to beer
  10. I drink coffee in the morning and tea in the afternoon
  11. I love to travel, trips planned this year: Amsterdam, Sicily and Paris.

11 Questions:

1. To borrow a question from the ones I was asked, what phrase/motto describes your life? Always look on the bright side of life.  I’m a glass half full type of person – I think my cheerfulness can sometimes be infuriating to others but what you gonna do?

2. What’s your favorite book that you’ve read in the past year?   So far this year (and there have been a lot of good ones so far) The Serpent of Venice by Christopher Moore, only just read this and really enjoyed it beyond all my expectations.

3. Which of the magical powers or objects in Harry Potter do you most wish you could have? – I’d like the watch/time spinner, however, as you’ve already picked that I think I’ll go with the cloak that gives invisibility then I can sneak about – actually, maybe not, not sure I want to sneak about – i wouldn’t mind one of those little basins of water where you can look back at memories – I think I’d prefer a tardis but I’ve just swapped series there!

4. If you could talk to one famous dead person, who would it be and why?  JRRTolkien – it would be folly not to.  I have questions – lots of questions.

5. What is your favorite old movie? By old, I mean at least pre-1970.  Rebecca, (by Daphne DuMaurier) old B&W with Joan Fontaine and Laurence Olivier.  I love that film, I also love the book to be honest and have read it a number of times.

6. What advice would you give yourself if you could travel back in time? (It’s up to you how far back you need to travel to give yourself the advice you want.) Do NOT read 50 Shades of Grey!  That’s a few hours of my life that I’ll never get back!  Seriously, I don’t know.  I guess I could tell myself to study harder when I was younger but pretty much I’m a fairly content type of person so I’m not sure I’d change anything really.

7. What is your biggest pet peeve? Public transport – which I use a lot because I don’t drive.  It’s basically the pits.  For example, there’s no such thing as missing one bus on my route – there’s usually three all together (because buses are like cattle and travel in herds – in fact we need to coin a phrase for them – like a pack of lions, a swarm of bees, a bevvy of buses), and of course once you’ve missed three buses you know you’re now in for a long wait.  Plus, bus drivers who don’t have peripheral vision!  And people who sit next to you, invade your space and insist on telling you their life story – even though you’re clearly trying to read!

8. What were (or are) your imaginary friends’ names?  I don’t have any imaginary friends.  I feel like I’ve missed out now!  I do talk to my dog though – which I get some very strange looks for when we’re out on walks.

9. What are the nicknames you’ve been saddled with over the years?  The most recent one is OW (which stands for old woman) – by my very romantic husband (this because I’m actually three years older than he is – toy boy!!)

10. What was your favorite fairy tale/Disney movie growing up?  Beauty and the Beast.  I love the story and the film and quite a lot of the retellings of this.

11. What was the last song you listened to?  Home by Fiona Bevan and Adam Glover. (The reason; I met Adam at a friend’s party and he’s a lovely person with a wonderful voice and incredibly charismatic.  Plus I think this is a beautiful song.  Check it out below:

And now for the cheating.  I’m not going to nominate 11 people!!  How bad is that.  I’m going to leave this open so if you’d like to post a review giving 11 facts about yourself and answer the 11 questions provided by Keri and leave me a link then I’d love to know what your answers are.  And, the reason that I’m cheating is not because I’m too lazy to go and choose 11 lovely blogs (and how very dare you for even thinking that) but is (1) how could I possibly choose (2) I want to give everyone the chance to do the facts and Q&A (3) I know how busy you all are so don’t want you to feel you have to take part and (4) who am I kidding – I’m just too lazy to go and look everyone up!!  Okay, I admit it.

Thanks Keri – I love answering random questions like this and it was great of you to think of me – hope you don’t mind my cheating – rules are made for breaking after all.

The Maze Runner by James Dashner, readalong week 1

This week sees the start of the Maze Runner (James Dashner) readalong.  The schedule is very easy going so if you fancy joining in just jump on board (send an email to SamAStevensWriter@gmail.com).  Details of schedule and participants at the end of the post.  Basically we all read the allocated chapters and then come up with questions which we all throw into the mixing pot and see what the results are.  My Q&A as follows (I’ve chosen roughly one question per participant (although I think I may have missed somebody??)  The usual obligatory spoiler declaration – if you haven’t read this and intend to do so then you might want to stop here:

1. There is a lot of ‘Glader’ language. Language is part of what makes a culture. How have the Gladers created their own culture? What other elements of culture do the Gladers have that are different from modern culture? (The others are social organization, customs/traditions, arts/literature, religion, government structure, and economic system.)  The Gladers way of life is a reflection of their need to survive.  I suppose the language has adapted over time.  I can’t really say I enjoy some of the phrases and it almost feels like it pulls me out of the story but I’m not surprised the author has used this, these boys are on their own here with no adults so it’s not really surprising that they’ve developed this language for themselves.  I suppose they’ve organised themselves into certain groupings based on weaker and stronger characters.  This reminds me a bit of a playground culture where you have bullies and popular kids.  As to the other social cultures its probably a bit early to determine but it will be interesting to think of those aspects as the story develops.

2. Do “normal” things like mayonnaise and tennis shoes take you out of the story, or ground you in it? Is “ordinary stuff” distracting or intriguing? That’s a really interesting question.  In a story set in a regular everyday world those things wouldn’t appear distracting.  What I find intriguing is the author has gone to such lengths to include those elements – such as mayonnaise on a sandwich.  It makes me wonder where the boys would get mayonnaise from??  On the face of it they appear to keep livestock and grow vegetables, etc, and be self sufficient.  This makes me wonder if they are being assisted in some ways?  I just can’t imagine them going to the trouble of making their own mayo – it’s probably a small query but it has made me wonder if they’re as self sufficient as they’re making out?

3. How do you think the leaders keep things so orderly, with the boys doing different jobs and figuring out where they fit best?  A little of this was already explained to Thomas in that the boys are given certain tasks and from there they’re chosen for whatever they seem to excel at.  How ‘order’ is maintained is another matter.  There seems to be a general rule of if you mess up you’ll be treated harshly – being thrown out or left for the grievers.  I guess that would keep people in their places.  It seems that in order to survive they all have to follow the rules and also I think others have learnt the hard way in the past and this has served as a lesson for the ones who now remain.

4. Why do you think the boys are there?  What are your guesses about what the place really is?  I haven’t read any reviews of this book so I have no other knowledge about what the Maze really is.  I was thinking two things.  Either the boys have all been put there as some sort of punishment and to survive as best they can – the Maze serves to keep them there as it clearly is a difficult to solve puzzle and is also dangerous with elements such as the grievers.  Or, maybe they’re in their as some sort of either entertainment or social experiment.  They are clearly being watched for example by these bug like insects.  Kind of puts me in mind of the Truman Show, crossed with Lord of the Flies and Saw!

5. Is the amnesia which Thomas is experiencing the result of a “mind wipe” or is it an on-going effect of the Glade?  Thomas has intermittent memory flashes in the first day he’s in Glade.  He has general impressions of a past life but no concrete memories.  I have experienced traumatic amnesia and there is no middle ground to remembering; it was a complete blank.  The symptoms which Thomas experiences seem to be a temporary condition which allows him to begin assimilation into the Glade.  As he falls asleep the first night he feels an unexpected calm which Chuck foreshadows in some of his statements about things getting easier.  It seems as though the boy’s memories have been tampered with – they don’t seem to have any recollection of pasts or families, etc.  I think this could be to allow a gradual ease into the Glade.  However, with Thomas he seems to be experiencing something that I think is more singular to him.  He comes across as though he’s been there before and has escaped??  Or could that also be a condition of his memory being tampered with?  It’s strange that he has a longing to go out with the runners already.  I suppose he could have been placed there to mix things up a bit.

6. Alby is speaking again, about rule number one. “…and if you ain’t killed by the Grievers, we’ll kill you ourselves, you get me?” This line further speculates (for me) that this situation, the maze, their living condtions, etc… they all suggest that Alby knows of something or is protecting something. Why? If he’s ultimately behind this or in charge, why did he bring himself down to their level?  I think that Alby is simply protecting the boys.  I suppose in this situation if you make an error of judgement you could place them all in danger and I get the feelings he’s trying to prevent that.  Although there is a general sense of secrecy and paranoia – the way nobody is telling Thomas anything?  It’s very curious – why not give him more information so that he knows what to expect.  Maybe he’s going to be chucked in at the deep end to see if he’ll survive. Very intriguing.

7. Do you think the narrator should have only focus on Thomas because I would have love to know what Chuck, Alby, Gally and Newt felt.  I’m quite enjoying the focus on Thomas at the moment and might find it a bit more distracting if we threw too many voices in the mix although I do like a multi POV story (such as Game of Thrones).  I would probably enjoy an alternate voice as the story progresses but I suppose keeping it to one voice we learn everything at the same time as the protagonist which increases the tension for us.

8.Environment plays a huge role in shaping a person. By removing the boys from their past environments (family, friends, society, etc.) and by removing their memories, does this fundamentally change the boys? If so, how? If not, do you think that the nature of who they are is innate and wins out over environmental factors? By having these boys “start fresh” in the Maze, is Dashner exploring how a person becomes who he/she is? Nature vs nurture. I was wondering if they had been put into the Maze as some sort of experiment or entertainment factor.  It will be interesting to see exactly why they are in there although if it is a social experiment it won’t have a big impact on us, the readers, because we won’t see the change in the boys as they’ve already had their minds wiped and so any changes would probably be a bit lost.

Schedule

Chapters 1-9     Read 27-April through 10-May. Submit Questions by 10-May. Post by 17-May
Chapters 10-19     Read 11-May through 24-May. Submit Questions by 24-May. Post by 31-May
Chapters 20-29     Read 25-May through 7-Jun. Submit Questions by 7-Jun. Post by 14-Jun
Chapters 30-38     Read 8-June through 21-Jun. Submit questions by 21-Jun. Post by 28-Jun
Chapters 39-51     Read 22-Jun through 5-Jul. Submit questions by 5-Jul. Post by 12-Jul
Chapters 52-End     Read 6-Jul through 19-Jul. Submit questions by 19 Jul. Post by 26 Jul

Other Participants to check out:

The Serpent of Venice by Christopher Moore

Just finished reading The Serpent of Venice by Christopher Moore and before I even start this review will say I LOVED this book.  Really, really, LOVED IT.

– Start interlude –

Now, I will begin by saying this was a revelation and a damned fine surprise for me and I’ll tell you why.  The story is a combination of two Shakespeare stories and an Edgar Allan Poe.  I’ve only read one of Shakespeare’s plays (stop gawping it’s not attractive) and I’ve read a few Poe but not this particular one.  I imagined that this would be filled with all sorts of ‘in jokes’ that would go well above my head (and not because I’m short in stature although I am and don’t mind admitting it).  Now, I’m sure there were lots of things here that did, in fact, go over my head – that other people would really enjoy – alas, I cannot tell you about those because they were lost on me, but I certainly didn’t come away from this thinking it had been difficult to grasp.  Also, the book is described as a comedy.  I know this sounds crazy but I don’t think I’ve ever bought a book before that was described as a comedy.  I’ve read books that had plenty of comedy in them as a matter of course but never knowingly picked one for that reason.  I’ve probably even read a few that were funny although not intentionally so. That’s not to say I don’t like to laugh, in fact this book is a massive testament to the fact that I do like to laugh – quite a lot – on public transport, in the office, when I’m actually reading with a torch and supposed to be asleep and waking other people in the house with my raucous snorting (can you actually snort raucously???).

– Interlude over –

To the book.  The inspirations: Othello, The Merchant of Venice and The Cask of Amontillado.  The leading man: Pocket – the Fool.  The rest of the cast decidedly Shakesperian.  The setting: Venice.  With a wickedly delicious sense of humour, dry wit, inventive cursing and fantastic plotting. I think this is decidedly one of the best books I’ve read so far this year.  I read it in a leap and a bound, literally two days and couldn’t put it down.

Pocket starts the story in a spot of bother.  He’s been taken captive and imprisoned.  Shackled to the walls of his prison, in the inky darkness he hears the wretched screams of a man in the final throes of life, followed by something slithering around the basement in which he is trapped!  Sounds pretty bleak for Pocket – fear not, he is after all the main protagonist and this would be a rather short story if he found himself eaten (especially as these are the opening chapters.)

I’m really not going to give away the plot and I’m certainly not going to give away what sort of creature is lurking beneath the dark waters of Venice. Suffice to say that this is a great story that surpassed my expectations. I went into this with a semi belligerent feeling of ‘not really my thing’ and came out of it thinking ‘where can I get more of this!’  So, think Shakespeare, written in a slightly more modern (and accessible)  style, with a few ‘methinks’ scattered throughout.  Think dark, horrible and sometimes a bit creepy.  Think plots within plots and more twists and turns than a twisty turny thing.  Now, imagine laughing out loud at the most inopportune moments and almost clapping your hands in delight at the wit (because clapping your hands whilst reading a book is always convenient).  Then, you have it in a nutshell.

I don’t know whether it comes across here but I really enjoyed this.  I would have no hesitation in recommending it.  It’s a great story, characters that you will know (even if you didn’t know that you knew them!), ghosts, conspiracy and monsters plus tears of laughter.  I kid you not.  Grab a hanky.

I will not say more because to do so would be to gild the lily or some such.

I received a copy via the publisher (and I’m damned pleased that I did) and the above is my own opinion.  Just read it already!

I’m submitting this as part of my 100 books a year challenge and also under the heading of ‘fantasy’ for Stainless Steel Droppings Once Upon a Time event.

« Previous PageNext Page »