Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman

Just finished reading Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman and thought it was brilliant!  This is an another author that I kept wanting to read because I’ve read such good things about but kept putting off (why? I don’t know – foolish-pigheaded-can’t-be-toldness – I suppose).  But, one thing which there is no doubt about, having read Neverwhere I will definitely be seeking out the rest of NG’s books.  He has such creativity and imagination.  Reading this book was like a roller coaster without the dips.  It was breathtaking and exhilarating and I was staggered at just how much was going on and the fact that just more and more kept happening.

This story is about a young man called Richard Mayhew.  Richard moves to London for a new job, finds a new girlfriend, becomes engaged and is set to run a steady-eddie type of existence on the straight and narrow.  He’s headed for the 2.5 kids with the picket fence.  Until, that is, he plays the good samaritan and rescues a young, apparently homeless woman, who not so much crosses his path but falls directly across it.  After this, his life spirals down into chaos.  Quite literally down, into the realms of London Below (and I’m not talking about the Underground) which is full to the brim with chaos and intriguing characters.  The young woman he has rescued is called (quite rightly once you realise her abilities) Door.  Her family has been murdered and she is on a quest to find answers.  Richard becomes her unwitting companion in this quest on a journey which is never short of danger.

I loved the world that is created in this book and really didn’t want it to end.  It’s dark and creepy and filled with strange characters.  The idea of London Below with all it’s parallels to London Above but with a twist is so well conceived.   Take Earl’s Court, for example, where a real medieval court is actually in situ in one of the carriages running alongside the rest of the carriages with their unsuspecting travellers.  And this is just one example of the play on words and names used throughout.  The way the story steps in and out between the real London and the imaginary one (but is it really imaginary?), so similar, yet so different.  London Above steeped in history whilst London Below still actually living it.  It’s remarkable.  And the parallels between this London below – with its people who have slipped between the cracks and become invisible to everyday people – and the real people in society who have actually become invisible.

Then we have the characters who are so easy to engage with.  Richard, the unsuspecting hero.  Door, vulnerable and yet tough.  The villainous Croup and Vandermar who are characters straight out of a pantomine, and, my personal favourite – the Marquis of Carabas – who puts me in mind of a slightly grubbier version of the Pimpernell with his flamboyant dress sense and over the top remarks.  And there are plenty more characters in there – all well imagined and written with an easy and flowing style, not bogged down with over the top descriptions or background but just enough to give you a taste and make you want to read more.

This book just puts me in mind of so many things, all of them good or classic, and yet amazingly manages to remain unique!  We have this whole sort of Wizard of Oz feel in that Door is searching for someone to give her answers (the great and terrible Oz) except in this case it’s not a wizard.  The actual setting of London Below reminds me of  The Labyrinth, where nothing is ever as it seems and piles of rags in a corner can suddenly stand and morph into a person, and Richard Mayhew puts me in mind of Arthur Dent from Hitchhiker’s Guide – just reluctantly dragged along and a little bit clueless (at least Richard didn’t get stuck wearing his pjs and robe!)  But, it puts me in mind of these things and yet is a strangely brilliant combination of all with it’s own voice, how is that even possible?

Okay, I’m not going to go on too much more because it’s fairly clear that I really enjoyed (nay, loved) this book!  I seem to be on a roll at the moment with my book choices thanks to some excellent bloggers whose recommendations have led me to pick up such great books! If you’re looking for a bit of fantasy and adventure, fast paced, dark, original, modern and creepy with a great set and amusing characters told with style and wit then this could be the one for you.

The only criticism I have for this book is that there doesn’t seem to be a follow-up and I would love there to be one!  That being said there are plenty more NG books for me to catch up with and I intend to take my time and savour them all.

Would I recommend this book?  Oh yes.

Rating A+

Neverwhere

Neverwhere

The Princess Bride by William Goldman

The Princess Bride is one of those books that I kept seeing reviews for (whilst looking out for other books) which simply state ‘you must read this book, it’s a classic’ and yet for some reason I kept putting the experience off – I think primarily because it’s one of those bug bears of mine about having to read the book before I see the film so that I use my own imagination and in this case as I’ve already seen the film (a number of times) reading it broke my golden rule.  What the hell, rules are made for breaking after all and so I finally went there.  And, I’m so glad that I did.  All you reviewers who insist this book should be read – you’re just so right.  It was brilliant, and the fact that I’d already seen the film didn’t deter from my enjoyment, in fact it added to it and I found myself picturing some of the scenes and reading the characters with the actor’s voices in my head.  I will admit, I was predisposed to like this book, so maybe I’m biased, but I really did love it.

Where to begin about this book.  It’s really a story within a story I suppose.  It’s a fairy tale that isn’t a fairy tale and it’s an abridged version of a much longer book (that doesn’t actually exist).  The full premise of it is brilliant.  I enjoyed all the little sections where Goldman explains his reasons for the changes or where he reflects back to when his father originally read him the story (which of course he didn’t!)  There is so much going on.  Pirates, princes and princesses, villains, swashbuckling, swordfighting, kidnap, romance, creepy forests, giants, and on and on…..  but, the absolute star of this book, without a doubt, is the humour it contains.  It made me laugh quite unreservedly (and in public on the bus which is a bit embarassing!)

The film veers very little from the original text with much of the story being replicated virtually word for word so if you love the film it’s a sure thing that you’ll love the book as it brings a bit more detail to each of the characters, a missing scene in a Zoo of Death and a bit of an explanation for the Prince’s desire to create war with Guilder – I loved the scene when he found his first potential ‘bride to be’ until the scene with the feast when her hat blows off!

In terms of the characters I’ve practically been having a fight with myself over my favourite.  I still can’t make my mind up!  Fezzik is so funny with his little rhymes.  Inigo with his sword fighting and his show stealing ‘Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!’ scene, but  my favourite character, I think, (or at least right now but I may revisit) is Westley because I love the dialogue attached to this character – so dry!

Don’t be put off thinking that this is a book aimed at young audiences, and, unlike me, don’t be put off if you’ve already seen the film!  The book brings so much more to it.  I think if you’ve seen the film and loved it you will be made up with the book and vice versa.  If you haven’t read or seen either – then run out now and buy them both because you’re in for a treat, particularly if you like a good adventure story, well told with plenty of humour.

I would definitely recommend this book and know for a fact that this is one novel that I will dip back in to.

Rating A

The Princess Bride

The Princess Bride

The Madonnas of Leningrad by Debra Dean

Just finished reading the Madonnas of Leningrad by Debra Dean for my book club choice.    In this debut novel we are brought the story of Marina Buriakov told during two different timelines, present day and WW11 in Leningrad.    The modern day story shows how Marina and her husband Dmitri are struggling to deal with their old age and it quickly becomes apparent that Marina is suffering the onset of Alzheimers and struggling greatly with short term memory loss.  Her memories from war torn Russia are however crystal clear and it is during Marina’s flashbacks that we begin to discover her earlier story, how she met her husband who was then taken to war and how she managed to survive the siege of Leningrad.

Out of the two timeframes I think the story of Marinas survival during the siege makes the more interesting read.  At the time Marina is working in the Heritage museum and as news of the war breaks the staff at the museum spend all their waking hours (and a few in which they should be sleeping) packing up the precious paintings and other valuables from the museum to be shipped out to safety.  We have a brief introduction to Dmitri before he is whisked away to war but then hear nothing more from him as the story obviously centres around Marina.  During the time we spend in Marina’s past we come to understand the incredible suffering that so many people faced during the siege.  Following the bombing of the food warehouses and the eventual surrounding of the outer rims of Leningrad by the Germans, thereby cutting off all routes, there was very little remaining to eat in the city.  Everything was rationed and eventually the only food available was three small portions of black bread (which was made with more cardboard than flour).  The death toll, particularly among women, children and the old and vulnerable was tremendous and people’s actions as they fought to stay alive became more and more desperate.  Marina is a woman who loves art – following the removal of the paintings she spends a lot of time touring the corridors and rooms of the museum with one of her colleagues trying to memorise the pictures that once covered the walls.  I like this idea of a memory palace which Marina and her friend construct – and where it seems Marina seems to retreat as the Alzheimers she suffers from takes yet more of her memories.

The more modern day story revolves around Marina and Dmitri attending a family wedding.  This side is very sympathetically told.  We see how gradually Dmitri has taken over most of the care for Marina and it’s really incredibly sad, especially when Dmitri finally realises that he is losing his wife to the disease, she is of course physically present but every day she becomes more and more withdrawn and it made me really so sad for both of them but especially Dmitri to lose his partner this way.  The story culminates when Marina goes missing after they have attended the wedding of their grand daughter.  A large search ensues and the extent of Marina’s deterioration is then finally made clear to the rest of her family.

In terms of criticisms.  Although I think this book is really well conceived and well told I liked, not loved it.  For me personally, I came away from the story feeling I had unfinished business.  I thought the story set in Leningrad was the better told of the two but even in this area I thought something was missing.  I never really felt as though there was a resolution to all the issues and certain areas just felt briefly touched upon.  I don’t think I ever really felt the true horror of the situation as a lot of the earlier chapters are taken up with the descriptions of the paintings – which I enjoyed – but, felt the rest of the story suffered as a result.  Thinking about that more of course it could have been the intention of the author to try and remove the readers from the horrors of the siege and give them this artistic respite, or more to the point perhaps it was showing us how Marina coped during that time by removing her self from the brutality surrouding her and became immersed in the artwork in her imagination?  I don’t know though – I think the situation could have been expanded upon.  Plus, I felt the reunion between Dmitri and Marina was very flat, not to mention brief.  And I think you would struggle to think of this as a love story (although it is true that in the more modern chapters you definitely witness the love between the couple).

In terms of the more contemporary story – I thought the characters were a bit flat.  I never really got a feel for the daughter and thought there was quite a lot of unspoken and unresolved tensions there that were never truly touched upon.  I also thought the ending was almost disappointingly sudden – again, perhaps the author was trying to demonstrate something there, perhaps a parallel – the speed with which the disease eventually progressed?  Or maybe she didn’t want to stretch this side of the story out which I can understand as it would probably be too upsetting for some people to read.

In spite of my objections I did think this was a good read I just wish it had been filled out a bit more.  I don’t mind reading short books as such but with this particular one I think it would have lent itself to a good deal more detail that I would certainly not have objected to.

Ratin

The Madonnas of Leningrad

The Madonnas of Leningrad

g -B

People of the Book by Geraldine Brooks

Just finished reading People of the Book.  This is a book that I bought some time ago but have delayed reading, not for any particular reason, although the description on the jacket is not the most exciting and may deter some people, but I like Geraldine Brooks work (I loved Year of Wonders and never lose an opportunity to recommend it strongly) and so there was never any doubt that I would eventually read this and to be honest I found it was a really good and compelling read.  In fact the pages have simply flown and now I’ve finished I feel there is so much to think about.

The story begins in Sarajevo in the 1990s where a precious artifact has been discovered and a well known conservator working for the UN  has been requested to bring her talents to the table to help restore this treasure in a sympathetic way.  The artifact in question is a rare prayer book known as a Haggadah – that has managed to survive intact in spite of the wars and atrocities surrounding it.  The story is told in the first person by Hannah, the UN conservator from Australia, and is interspersed by a number of third person short historical stories that gradually work their way back over time and place to stretch back to the book’s original inception in the 1400s.

There is so much of interest contained in this novel that it is literally difficult to put it down.  It is a fictionalised account of a series of possibilities surrounding the true discovery and restoration of this ancient Jewish prayer book.  We start off in Sarajevo in 1940 when the book is rescued from the looting then taking place under the German occupation.  Gradually we work our way backwards through time looking briefly at historical events taking place in Vienna, Venice, Barcelona and Sierra.  At the same time we follow Hannah’s progress from uncovering the book and finding a number of things contained within the pages which may help to uncover some of it’s history to her globetrotting antics in order to invesitage these items.

The story is so well written, and the short stories are full of interesting descriptions and people, and although this is a story of persecution it is also a story of living together harmoniously.  We are shown a brief history of the relationship between different religions and how needless destruction is caused by unnecessary prejudice, we are also shown how, when these cultures live harmoniously together they are able to enrich each others lives.  Interestingly, reading the Afterword, you discover that the Haggadah escaped certain destruction on two occasions through the efforts of two muslims who took great risks to ensure that this artifact survived.

I don’t really have any criticisms as such.  I will admit that I enjoyed the short historical stories more than Hannah’s own personal tale (which for me took a bit of an unnecessary turn – and also, although well written, I didn’t particularly enjoy Hannah’s character overly – but perhaps that was the intention of the author as Hannah had been raised in a rather ‘love free’ zone and her character seemed a little austere).  I could quite easily have read more of these historical chapters (particularly Lola and Zahra), they are rich in detail and although short I became easily intrigued with each different set of characters.

I would definitely recommend this book.  I think you need to persevere through the first few pages, which are quite rich in detail about the restorative process and whilst they are a testament to the amount of research that the author has undertaken they are not gripping, once past this inital stage however the story is totally intriguing.  If you love a bit of history and don’t mind the cutting from modern to historical, weaved together with a bit of investigation and mystery and a more uptodate story of duplicity then definitely give this a go.

Rating -A

Lord of the Rings read along, Return of the King, Part 3

Just finished reading the final instalment of Return of the Kings, the journey has finally reached its conclusion 😦  – sad because it’s now ended.

Of course we all know the ending and these last few chapters have just been the round-ups.  So, without further ado, to this week’s questions/discussion points:

What do you think Gandalf was going to speak with Tom Bombadil about?

You know, I’ve racked my tiny brain about this and genuinly don’t have the first clue (plus ‘racked my brain’ is probably a bit over the top as it’s so tiny – took me about 30 seconds!).  Maybe there’s a clue in the whole ‘rolling stones gather no moss’ saying but I really can’t figure it out.  Need to think on it some more.  I’m sure it will all become really obvious when I read everyone else’s posts and I’ll just be like ‘Doh!’

What did you think of the two weddings? Do you think Eowyn will eventually find happiness with Faramir?

I actually do think think Eowyn will find happiness with Faramir.  Initially they both seemed, to me, to be a bit slightly saddened characters, Faramir because of the way his father behaved and Eowyn because she felt a bit restricted/unhappy in the role she played and also because she had unrequited love for Aragorn (but, you know, take a ticket and get in line!) But, I’ve decidedpersonlly to give them a happy ending, in my vision they are totally enamoured with each other, they make each other feel good, their pasts are put behind them and they move on in a happy way (but I’m a sucker for a happy ending!)

What did you think of their meeting with Saruman on the road home?  I was half expecting someone to just kill Saruman.

Oh, my, god, I did want somebody to kill Saruman – but I think that if one of them had done so it would have been like a blight on their own character.  As it turned out, one bad soul killed the other which felt almost fair! Which sounds a bit wrong given that they both ended up dead  ultimately but it was inevitable.  At first I was almost thinking that if Gandalf had just sorted Saruman out then it wouldn’t have been so dire for Hobbiton  but I think Tolkien was giving the Shire a chance to stand up and show it’s metal.  And, I liked seeing the way Merry and Pippin came into their own like battle-hardened warriors.

Holy Cow I was not expecting the scouring of the shire.  If this is your first time reading, were you surprised? And if this isn’t your first time reading, does the shock get a little easier to swallow on re-read?

Well, I’ve already probably covered this above – it was a surprise, and I have no recollection of reading this the first time (maybe I skipped it ‘oops’) – plus did this happen in the film – I can’t remember it doing so?  Anyway, no the shock is no less a surprise because I genuinley had forgotten!

What did you think of the very end, of the departure of the Havens? 

This is another one of those ‘grey’ areas for me and I think maybe I need to read this bit again (another 8 or 20 times!)  It always feels to me that the people who leave on the boat are actually dying?  But that would just make me feel so sad so I’m actually in denial about that.  And, I’m fairly certain I’m wrong, but it feels like they’re on the last journey over the water with the ferryman taking them to their place of rest.  *shivers*

Characters are supposed to change and develop during a story, right?  Who changed more, Sam or Frodo?

Okay, my first thought was to say that Sam changed more and that Frodo couldn’t change and carry on with his life like he had before which is why he left.  Then I thought, mmm, actually, no, Frodo changed the most which is why he could no longer live the same life as before.  Okay, I was having a bit of internal conflict with this one but I’ve made my decision: Frodo.

And, so we’ve come to the end of our journey.  I almost feel a bit footsore!  Seriously, I’ve really enjoyed this read along and the discussion posts.  I hope that we can all do something similar again, after all:

“the road goes ever on and on”

Thanks everyone! 😀

Other discussions at:

All Booked Up
The Blue Fairy’s Bookshelf
Lynn’s Book Blog
Book Den
Geeky Daddy

Little Red Reviewer

Lynn

The Return of the King

The Return of the King

« Previous Page — Next Page »